A Validated Non-Aqueous Potentiometric Titration Method for Quantitative Determination of Alprazolam from Pharmaceutical Preparation
Rele Rajan V.* , Tiwatane Prathamesh P.
Department of Chemistry, D.G. Ruparel College, Mahim, Mumbai 400 016.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: drvinraj@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
A simple precise, rapid accurate and sensitive non-aqueous potentiometric titration method was developed for quantitative determination of alprazolam from pharmaceutical dosage form. The titration was carried out using standardized 0.1 N perchloric acid. The proposed method was found to be precise with % RSD <1 (n = 6). The method showed strict linearity (r2 > 0.9999 ) between 20 % to 100 % of 0.100 mg of drug substance weight. The percentage recovery of alprazolam in the optimized method was between 100.0 to 100.416 %. The method is also found to be rugged when checked by different analysts and using different lots of reagents and different makes of titrators.
KEYWORDS: Alprazolam, Perchloric acid, Potassium hydrogen phthalate, Glacial acetic acid.
INTRODUCTION
Alprazolam is chemically 8-chloro-1-methyl-6-phenyl-4H-(1,2,4) triazolo (4,3a)1,4-benzodiazepine, which is a short acting anxiolytic drug. It also possesses sedative, hypnotic, anticonvulsant, amnesic and skeletal muscle relaxant property. Alprazolam is a short-acting drug of the benzodiazepine. It is used to treat moderate to severe anxiety disorders and panic attacks and is used as an adjunctive treatment for anxiety associated with moderate depression.
Alprazolam may be habit-forming, and long-term use and abuse may cause a physical dependence to develop along with withdrawal reactions during abrupt or rapid discontinuation. Although the side-effect profile of alprazolam may occur in some patients. Some side-effects may disappear with continued treatment. If signs of an allergic reaction occur - such as hives; difficulty breathing; swelling of face, lips, tongue, or throat. Literature survey reveals the HPLC [1] and spectrophotometric [2-6] methods for the estimation of alprazolam. Simple, rapid and reliable no aqueous titration method is developed for the determination of alprazolam. This method can be used for the routine analysis. In the proposed methods optimization and validation of this method are reported.
Structure of alprazolam
EXPERIMENTAL:
Instrumentation
An potentiometric titrator was used ( Lab- India-Auto titrator ) for assay method development and validation.
A Shimadzu analytical balance with 0.01 mg was used.
Reagents and chemical
Reference standard of alprazolam was obtained from reputed firm with certificate of analysis.
Potassium hydrogen phthalate , perchloric acid and glacial acetic acid of A. R. grade were used.
General procedure
Standardization of 0.1 N perchloric acid
About 0.350 mg of potassium hydrogen phthalate (previously powdered lightly, dried at 120oC for 2 hours) was weighed accurately into clean and dry titration jar. It was dissolved in 50 ml of glacial acetic acid. About 0.1 ml of crystal violet solution ( 0.5 % w/v in anhydrous glacial acetic acid ) was added. It was titrated with 0.1 N perchloric acid using auto titrator. Blank determination was performed out for necessary correction. The titration was performed in duplicate.
One ml of 0.1 N HClO4 is equivalent to 0.2042 gm of potassium hydrogen phthalate (C8H5KO4)
W
Normality of perchloric acid = --------------------------
B.R. x 0.2042
Where,
W is weight of potassium hydrogen phthalate in g.
B.R. is burette reading in ml.
Quantitative determination of alprazolam
About 0.100 g. of alprazolam test sample was weighted accurately into a clean and dried titration jar. It was dissolved in 35 ml. of anhydrous glacial acetic acid and 15 ml of 5% (w/v) mercuric acetate.
It was titrated with 0.1 N perchloric acid potentiometrically.
Blank determination was also carried out for necessary correction.
One ml of 1 N perchloric acid is equivalent to 0.07719 g. of alprazolam
% (Percentage) Alprazolam on the dried basis was calculated as below.
B.R. x N x 0.07719 x 100
% Assay = ------------------------------------------
W
Where,
B.R. is burette reading in ml at the potentiometric end point.
N is actual normality of 0.1 N perchloric acid.
W is weight of the sample taken in g.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION:
Determination of alprazolam
The objective of this work was to determine accurately the content of alprazolam. The assay of alprozolam (on the dried basis) of various batches of alprazolam test sample was analyzed using the above method. It was in the range of 100.0 % to 100.416 %.
Analytical method validation
The method precision was checked after analyzing six different preparations of homogeneous test sample of alprazolam. The % RSD of results obtained was found to be 0.6743. It confirms good precision of the method. The results are presented in table 1.
Table no. 1 : Method of precision
|
Sr.no |
Weight of alprazolam |
Burette reading in ml |
Normality of perchloric acid |
% assay |
|
1 |
0.100 |
13.0 |
0.09990 |
100.246 |
|
2 |
0.100 |
13.02 |
0.09990 |
100.400 |
|
3 |
0.100 |
13.0 |
0.09990 |
100.246 |
|
4 |
0.100 |
12.98 |
0.09990 |
100.09 |
|
5 |
0.100 |
13.0 |
0.09990 |
100.246 |
|
6 |
0.100 |
13.0 |
0.09990 |
100.246 |
|
|
|
|
Mean |
100.2457 |
|
|
|
|
Std. Deviation |
0.098032 |
|
|
|
|
RSD |
0.09779 |
Linearity
For the establishment of method linearity ,five different weights of alprazolam test samples corresponding to 20 % ,40 %, 60 % , 80 % and 100 % of the about weight (0.100 g.) were taken and analyzed for % (percentage) of alprazolam content. The results are in table 2.
Table no.2 : Linearity
|
Sr. No. |
Weight of alprazolam |
Burette reading |
Normality of Perchloric acid |
% assay |
|
1 |
0.020 |
2.61 |
0.09990 |
100.63 |
|
2 |
0.040 |
5.22 |
0.09990 |
100.63 |
|
3 |
0.060 |
7.80 |
0.09990 |
100.24 |
|
4 |
0.080 |
10.41 |
0.09990 |
100.34 |
|
5 |
0.100 |
13.0 |
0.09990 |
100.24 |
|
|
|
|
Mean |
100.416 |
|
|
|
|
Std. Deviation |
0.199575 |
|
|
|
|
RSD |
0.1986 |
The potentiometric titration was conducted once at each level. Linearity curve Figure no .1 was drawn by plotting test sample weight in gram on x axis and titre values on y axis.
Fig. no.1: Linearity curve
The values of correlation coefficient, slope and intercept are given in table 3.
Table no.3: Regression values
|
Parameter |
Values |
|
Slope |
130.85 |
|
Intercept |
-0.023 |
|
Coefficient of co-relation |
0.9999 |
Accuracy and recovery
Accuracy was determined at five different levels i.e., 20 % ,40 % ,60 % ,80 % and 100 % of the nominal concentration. (0.100 g.) The titration was conducted in triplicate at each level and the titre value was recorded. The tire value obtained in linearity study was considered as true value during the calculation of percentage ( %) recovery. The percentage recovery is calculated using following equation.
Titre value X 100
Percentage recovery = ---------------------------
True titre value
The percentage range recovery of alprazolam was in 100.0 to 100.416 %. It confirms the accuracy of the proposed method. (Table 4).
Table no 4 : accuracy and precision
|
Level no. |
Weight of alprazolam added |
Weight of alprazolam found |
% assay |
Mean % assay |
|
1 |
0.020 |
0.0200 |
100.0 |
100.00 |
|
0.020 |
0.0201 |
100.5 |
||
|
0.020 |
0.0199 |
99.5 |
||
|
2 |
0.040 |
0.400 |
100.0 |
100.4167 |
|
0.040 |
0.0402 |
100.5 |
||
|
0.040 |
0.0403 |
100.75 |
||
|
3 |
0.060 |
0.0600 |
100.0 |
100.0333 |
|
0.060 |
0.0601 |
100.1 |
||
|
0.060 |
0.0600 |
100.0 |
||
|
4 |
0.080 |
0.0800 |
100.0 |
100.04 |
|
0.080 |
0.0801 |
100.12 |
||
|
0.080 |
0.0800 |
100.0 |
||
|
5 |
0.100 |
0.1020 |
102.0 |
101.00 |
|
0.100 |
0.1010 |
101.0 |
||
|
0.100 |
0.1000 |
100.0 |
RUGGEDNESS:
The ruggedness of the method is defined as degree of reproducibility of results obtained by analysis of alprazolam sample under variety of normal test conditions such as different laboratories, different analysts and different lots of reagents. Quantitative determination of alprazolam was conducted potentiometrically on one laboratory. It was again tested in another laboratory using different instrument by different analyst. The assays obtained in two different laboratories were well in agreement. It proved ruggedness of the proposed method.
CONCLUSION:
The proposed method of non-aqueous potentiometric titration was found to be precise, accurate and rugged. The values of percentage recovery and standard deviation showed sensitivity. The method was completely validated. It showed satisfactory data for all the parameters of validation. Hence it can be applied for routine quality control application.
REFERENCES:
1. P. Pérez-Lozano, E. Garc´ıa-Montoya, A. Orriols, M. Miñarro, J.R. Ticó, J.M. Suñé- Negre, , Development and validation of a new HPLC analytical method for the determination of alprazolam in tablets. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 34; 2004: 979–987.
2. Ata. Kiran Kumar, A. Mohanakrishna, M. Sudheer, K.Sai Rajesh and P. Ramalingam, UV Spectrophotometric Method for the estimation of Alprazolam in Tablet Dosage Form, International Journal of Chem Tech Research, , 3(1); 2011: 161-164.
3. Shaik Sarfaraz, Ch. Venkata Ramana Readdy and K. M. A. Shareef, Method development, validation and determination of Alprazolam in its pharmaceutical dosage by 2,3-dichloro 5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 6(9); 2014: 411-418.
4. S. Sharma and M.C. Sharma, method development and validation of UV Spectrophotometric method for alprazolam in pharmaceutical dosage form using ferric chloride and indigo carmine European Journal of Applied Sciences, ,3(3); 2011:81-85.
5. Rele Rajan, Amey Deshpand, UV Spectrophotometric Estimation of Alprazolam by Area Under Curve And First Order Derivative Methods in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Dosage Form, Der Pharmacia Lettre, , 8 (5); 2016:105- 110
6. Rele Rajan Amey V. Deshpande, UV Spectrophotometric Estimation of Alprazolam by second and third order derivative Methods in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Dosage Form, Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, (4); 2016:272-278.
Received on 08.09.2016 Modified on 15.10.2016
Accepted on 10.11.2016 © AJRC All right reserved
Asian J. Research Chem. 2016; 9(11): 597-600.
DOI: 10.5958/0974-4150.2016.00080.8